essays

Alternative US Foreign Policy: Heal the World

Oct 1st, 2009 | By

Presentation by Marilyn Langlois of Transcend USA, Berkeley California

Transcend workshop on Alternative Foreign Policies-World Domestic Policy

Nordic Peace Academy, Jondal Norway, August 3-7, 2009

 

What we want

The United States commits to partnering as one member in the family of nearly 200 nation states in the world, and to participating in global cooperation, not dominance. Our ultimate goal is to fully embrace and embody the principles of The Earth Charter, introduced to us by Diana Young of Transcend USA, who participated in its development and dissemination. We invite all other peoples and nation states to join us in doing so.

Read more on Alternative US Foreign Policy: Heal the World…

Print Friendly
Share

Print Friendly
Share


New Energy for a Nuclear-weapon-free World Rene Wadlow

Sep 15th, 2009 | By

Written by Rene Wadlow

Peace is the only battle worth waging. - Albert Camus

Almost from the moment that the first atomic bomb was detonated in New Mexico in July 1945, the menace of the nuclear age inspired visions of a world free of nuclear weapons. However, the efforts of Governments and popular anti-nuclear weapon movements have gone in cycles with some milestones such as the Russell-Einstein Manifesto in 1955, the 1970 ratification of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, and the 1982 2nd UN General Assembly Special Session on Disarmament.

Read more on New Energy for a Nuclear-weapon-free World Rene Wadlow…

Print Friendly
Print Friendly
Share


Peacebuilding in Eastern Congo Need for Reconciliation Bridge-Builders

Sep 10th, 2009 | By

 

written by Rene Wadlow

The United Nations has some 17,000 UN forces (MONUC) in the Democratic Republic of Congo mostly in the administrative provinces of North and South Kivu. MONUC is the UN’s largest peacekeeping mission, but their capacity is stretched to the limit. Their mission is to protect civilians, some 250,000 of which have been driven from their homes since the fighting intensified in late August 2008. Despite the MONUC troops, there are large-scale occurrences of wilful violations of human rights and humanitarian law by all parties in the conflict, with massive displacement of populations, plundering of villages, systematic rape of women, increasingly rape of men as well, summary executions and the use of child soldiers.

Read more on Peacebuilding in Eastern Congo Need for Reconciliation Bridge-Builders…

Print Friendly
Print Friendly
Share


THE CRIMES OF BONGO: APARTHEID & TERROR IN AFRICA’S GARDENS OF EDEN

Jul 22nd, 2009 | By

By keith harmon snow; www.allthingspass.com

Appeared on 13 July 2009

The June death of Gabon’s little ‘Big Man’—President Al Hajji Omar Bongo Ondimba—inspired praise worldwide.

Cameroon’s President Biya saluted Bongo’s wisdom while French President Sarkozy called Bongo the “great and loyal friend of France.” Equatorial Guinea declared three days of national mourning and a ‘saddened’ U.S. President Obama lauded Bongo’s role in ‘shaping’ U.S.-Gabon relations for 41 years and his dedication to nature conservation and conflict resolution. “At a continental level,” bemoaned Zambia’s President Banda, “he was a pan-Africanist who tirelessly and tenaciously worked for the unity of the African continent.”

Read more on THE CRIMES OF BONGO: APARTHEID & TERROR IN AFRICA’S GARDENS OF EDEN…

Print Friendly
Print Friendly
Share


Africa and the end of hunger

Jul 21st, 2009 | By
 
Eric Holt-Giménez and Raj Patel

Source:Pambazuka.org

            

 

 

 

 

‘Africa and the end of hunger’ is an extract from Pambazuka Press’s groundbreaking new book Food Rebellions! Crisis and the Hunger for Justice by Eric Holt-Giménez and Raj Patel. Recommended by figures like Walden Bello and Wangari Maathai, the book is available to Pambazuka News readers at 20% off the recommended retail price of £16.95 and comes with a free ebook copy. Simply enter 56784813 as the discount code when ordering online. The Food Rebellions! ebook is also available on its own for only £5.

Read more on Africa and the end of hunger…

Print Friendly
Print Friendly
Share


One man’s pirate is another man’s Coast Guard

Jun 29th, 2009 | By

By  K’naan

 

Source:

http://www.blackpower.com/arts-culture/why-we-dont-condemn-our-pirates/

Friday, April 17, 2009

Can anyone ever really be for piracy? Outside of sea bandits, and young girls fantasizing of Johnny Depp, would anyone with an honest regard for good human conduct really say that they are in support of Sea Robbery?

Read more on One man’s pirate is another man’s Coast Guard…

Print Friendly
Print Friendly
Share


MILITARY PEACE MISSIONS AND CULTURAL AWARENESS

Jun 29th, 2009 | By

By Johan Galtung – appeared on 29 Jun 09, transcend.org 

naugural Speech CITpax Seminar, European Commission, Madrid, 17 Jun 09

    Officials from the Ministry of Defense, Officers from the Army, Ladies and Gentlemen,
     Power comes in hard and soft varieties, be that as economic power, exploitation vs equity; military power, offensive vs defensive; or political power (dictatorship vs democracy).  Or as cultural power, legitimizing the three hard forms vs legitimizing the soft ones.  That makes cultural awareness essential in all human interaction, including conquest by killing bodies, or by conquering hearts and minds.  Whether uniformed people can combine the two, with guns in one hand and spades, water canisters in the other, delivering pain and pleasure, is another and dubious matter.  Let us explore.
    Culture is more than such superficial aspects as not pointing your feet at anybody or touching their heads, covering heads entering sacred places of the abrahamic religions, not being too direct.  It is also deep culture, the unspoken assumptions about what is normal and natural, and collective memory, of sacred times and places, of trauma and glory.  Following Sun Tzu, who like the Greek gnothi se auton said "know thyself", why not start with Spanish deep culture?
    Francisco Franco once said that Spain is not a dictatorship but a hierarchy.  At his time it was both.  But there were deep trends in the second half of the past century: democracy gradually emerged, also from inside the falange, and Spain secularized like the rest of the West at the time.  The Father in Heaven lost His force as human guide,  the Mother’s intercession lost its significance, the Holy Spirit remained nebulous.  But vertical deep culture is often reproduced, like vertical deep structure moving from politics to economics.  After a short while Spain was guided by a Father residing in Washington DC, a Mother in Brussels, both taking that little sinner after 40 years dictatorship by the hands, informed by the Holy Spirit of democracy and human rights.  The prodigal son had returned to the fold.
    Till March 2003 and March 2004; la hora de la verdad, The Choice. Father Washington demanded an attack on Iraq based on insights not available to ordinary human minds, in the name of the Holy Spirit.  Mother Brussels was divided against herself.  Democracy demanded no attack; up to 92% according to late public opinion polls.  Washington won over democracy, verticality over horizontality.  Tio Paco had become Uncle Sam.  Spain was not una, grande, libre, but divided and dependent.  Till democracy won over Washington, after 11M in 2004.
    For a people well trained in repairing relations to God the Father after fits of sinfulness, mainstream Spanish politics now had to repair relations to Washington the Father.  A major problem: He may be ill, suffering from the decline and fall of aging empires.  Spain’s answer in some years is predictable: turning to a harder Mother.
    Conclusion: obedience to Washington, including accepting the "soft power" US style demanded by Pentagon after the failure of military interventions nos. 240 and 241 since Jefferson.  Hearts and minds rather than bodies.  Will it work in Iraq and Afghanistan?
    In Iraq, clans and classical Bedouin values are still in command: hospitality, generosity, dignity, courage, honor.  And the sacredness of women and children–broken by Al Qaeda 9/11, causing antagonism.  To murder them, and some "insurgents", from 40,000 feet, or by drones, is the epitome of immorality and cowardice.  Like Norwegian soldiers sneaking in on caves in Afghanistan listening for human voices, then calling for a US attack killing civilians seeking cover.  Or bombing using US coordinates, not knowing the targets.  All of this observed by Iraqis through a prism defined by the massacre of 1258, of the same magnitude as the million killed so far, with 5 millon displaced.  Or by Afghans trained on Alexander the Great, English invasions 1838 and 1878, Soviet Union in 1978.  "Here they go again" is the obvious conclusion.  Not easily counteracted these very strong cultures.
    That the West is fighting a triple war, against those who resist any secularization ("talibans"), those who resist the fiction of a unitary state run from Kabul ("warlords"), and those who resist being invaded as part of some chessboard game, is already problematic.  Much more problematic are time, space and Islam: for them the struggle has only one ending, the last uniformed foreigner out regardless of time; Islam drawing on the whole space of the 1,3 billion ummah from Morocco to Mindanao; never capitulate to infidels.  Culture at work, again.
    Cultures come in many varieties, like collectivist-individualist, and violent-nonviolent.  Military culture is collectivist-violent, so is ETA, so were Nazi Germany and militarist Japan.  Question violence and you question the collective corpus mysticum.  This carries over to the democratic-individualist cultures inspired by hard readings of the abrahamic religions: Judaism, Christianity and Islam with divine, not only state mandates to kill, making USA, Israel, Ottoman Empire and UK the most belligerent countries in the past millennium (defined by the number of wars divided by the number of years of existence).
    Contrast that with the buddhist country Viêt Nam.  No divine mandate to kill, but a strong sense of a karma gone wrong, badly in need of repair, not revenge.  9/11 did not come from them.  Or with a China devastated by English opium "trade" and imperialism, yet no revenge.  Reality is yin/yang, demanding understanding, not revenge.
    Individualist-nonviolent cultures exist, more as Catalan seny, as negotiating-bargaining commercialism–soft economy, good at nonviolent politics–than as Basque or Castillan heroism.  Do they need uniforms?
    Or – take Norway, my country, under German occupation 1940-45.  From the beginning they tried the heart and minds approach, building roads, equalized livelihood under rationing.  And they used force.  We hated them, spat on their roads–and used them.  Some were quislings but then more out of conviction, not because they had been bought.
    But the goals are not occupation, but human rights and democracy!  Yes. I hear, mediating Iraq and Afghanistan, the human right not to be invaded, occupied and killed, and enough world democracy in the UN to accord to the Muslim part of the world the veto of some lesser powers.
    All of this changes with the change from Chapter 7 peace enforcement "missions" to Chapter 6 peacekeeping operations, PKO.  The job is to reduce violence, often between groups with different cultures.  Cultural awareness is crucial.  As are joint peacekeeping with Muslims, high percentage of women with more cultural awareness and human sensitivity, defensive arms discretely carried, knowledge of police and nonviolence techniques like crowd control, of mediation, and so many peacekeepers that the blue caskets or caps become a blue carpet, leaving little space for war.  The culture invoked would be human decency unsullied by the hard cultures above of "asymmetric war" (a euphemism for resistance against high-tech invasion-occupation).
    And yet PKO are not solutions, only stop gap measures, "order" and "stability" where deep changes are needed, like UNIFIL in Lebanon. A deep change would be a Middle East Community of Israel with its five neighboring Arab countries, Palestine fully recognized as a state in accordance with international law.  However, the worse, the most violent country, Israel, the more gratitude for ceasefire, and the less real push for a lasting solution, like the European Community (which, incidentally, was not between Germany and Luxembourg).
    How about Iraq and Afghanistan?  For them to decide.  Could be a loose federation for Iraq, that 1916 artefact; and a federation for Afghanistan within a Central Asian Community, with joint UNSC-OIC PKO.
    Could be.  But that requires solution and conciliation-oriented peace cultures with lots of peacebuilding projects.  Not a paranoid security culture, filled with manicheism, autism and license to kill, not even able to see the other side of piracy, like Spanish trawling.

Read more on MILITARY PEACE MISSIONS AND CULTURAL AWARENESS…

Print Friendly
Print Friendly
Share


Barack Obama’s Non-Ideological Pragmatism Will Backfire

May 20th, 2009 | By

Written By Rabbi Michael Lerner

Source: Tikkun Magazine

President Barack Obama’s very nonideological pragmatism, which has received so much praise inside the Beltway and which has given him public support in his few months in office, will ultimately be the downfall of his presidency.
This approach and the free pass it generates from the media may indeed allow him to push through programs that here and there make significant advances toward a more generous and caring society. But it guarantees that he will not be able to gain mass support for a coherent worldview that can form the basis for an alternative to “let the marketplace decide,” which has been the guiding principle for American domestic politics, and “let our power shape the world,” which has been our primary approach to foreign policy.
The nonideological approach implicitly encourages us to believe in Obama himself – he will be our savior, our refuge, our deliverer from the bad times of the Bush administration.
And indeed he may. I believe that we’ve never had a more brilliant, decent and spiritually grounded president. Yet by failing to educate people on a fundamentally different way of thinking, by eschewing articulation of the spiritual and ethical principles that ought to guide us as a society and showing how his programs flow from those principles, Obama is disempowering those who will have to continue the fight when he is no longer president.
Contrast this with the political right, which has consistently articulated its views that the capitalist market is the ultimate arbiter and stabilizer of our society and that all good things will flow from empowering it to work its magic; and that homeland security can best be achieved by dominating other countries around the world and insisting that they follow our leadership.
Even when their policies fail, or are repudiated by the public, they stay on message, and hence have managed to persuade a solid 30 percent of the country to follow irrational policies and to oppose any serious change.
While I despise the content of their politics, their ideological consistency and willingness to educate the public to their worldview has given them a great advantage over liberals who fear to put forward a coherent alternative lest they be labeled “ideologues.”  With that committed base that they’ve fostered, they push the media in ways that make them far more powerful than their numbers would justify. In fact, at this very moment, and despite the outcome of the 2008 election, they are able to put the Obama Administration and the Democrats in Congress on the defensive, because the Democrats are unable to mobilize their own base around “pragmatism” and a non-ideological “lets be realistic” politics.
I watched how the nonideological perspective of the Clinton White House played out in winning short-term victories by embracing the pro-market and pro-power ideologies of the right. Sure, the Clintons were “pragmatic” and got lots of their legislation passed. But since they avoided a commitment to an alternative worldview, they failed to build an American constituency that would reject the retrograde policies of the Reagan-Bush I-Bush II years.
The result: Even at the moment of greatest economic success, in the year 2000, the Democrats could not hold onto the White House or win back control of Congress, and soon all that had been legislated was dismantled.

Read more on Barack Obama’s Non-Ideological Pragmatism Will Backfire…

Print Friendly
Print Friendly
Share


Sri Lanka reconciliation : Kuan Yin : She who harkens to the cries of the world

May 19th, 2009 | By

By Rene Wadlow*

Wise in using skilful means

In every corner of the world

She manifests her countless forms

Sri Lanka: After the final round of armed violence: a need for a vision of the future. Citizens of the World call for creative responses to the challenge of new government structures.

Read more on Sri Lanka reconciliation : Kuan Yin : She who harkens to the cries of the world…

Print Friendly
Print Friendly
Share